VoIP Survivor | ![]() |
| Android OS is as far from Linux as Symbian is Posted: 02 Jun 2008 06:17 AM CDT MobileCrunch recently compared Android OS with LiMo. Both are viewed as Linux-based platforms for handsets. However, I think they missed a crucial point - Android OS is simply not Linux.I’d like to first fix the comparison table on MobileCrunch’s post based on the interesting comments found in that specific post.
Here is a list to summarize the differences:
Of all these, there is one that stands out the most - the Java part. Linux is a great platform. Applications in Linux are written in a myriad of languages, but at the heart of it there is C/C++ code. This includes the many C system calls in Linux as well as a very rich infrastructure of libraries and development tools - all of which are simply inaccessible to Android developers. Unless Android will provide access to the C/C++ level, it will not matter if it is written on top of Linux, Windows Mobile, Symbian or even Commodore. As the operating system and its ecosystem is buried deep inside Android - who will really care? It doesn’t matter if Java is faster or slower, or even if it’s J2EE, J2ME or Google’s Java flavor - it is simply not Linux. Starting to develop on Android is going to be similar to migrating to Symbian. You start by relearning everything you already know just to write your applications. This is not a good starting point for a new platform. The only reason why Android may succeed is due to the strength of Google. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from VoIP Survivor To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email Delivery powered by FeedBurner |
| Inbox too full? | |
| If you prefer to unsubscribe via postal mail, write to: VoIP Survivor, c/o FeedBurner, 20 W Kinzie, 9th Floor, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |


0 comments:
Post a Comment